Recently, discussions on whether universities in China, especially renowned ones like Peking University and Tsinghua University, should open their campuses to the public have gained momentum. This debate was ignited by a series of social media posts by Associate Professor Li Zhi from Peking University, challenging the current practice of identity checks at university entrances.
Li criticized the inconvenience caused by these security measures to students and staff, sparking a divided response from the public. Some netizens argue for more open access to universities, asserting that these institutions should welcome broader societal participation. However, others express concerns about potential disturbances to campus order and safety.
A review of policies across various universities reveals different approaches to campus accessibility. Peking University and Tsinghua University, for instance, have recently started reopening their campuses, albeit with limitations to weekends, public holidays, and pre-approved reservations under specific conditions. In contrast, institutions like Lanzhou University, Fudan University, and Zhejiang University permit external visitors with reservations, while Sichuan University and Harbin Institute of Technology have fully opened their gates, foregoing the reservation requirement.
The argument for greater openness hinges on the idea that universities are public resources, vital for fostering communal understanding and lifelong learning opportunities. However, the stringent security protocols implemented in recent times have led to increased friction between security personnel and students, as highlighted by Li. He advocates for more nuanced security measures within campuses, rather than restrictive entrance policies.
The pandemic brought about closed campus management as a safety measure, but prolonged closures may impede research, teaching, humanistic exchange, and social interaction. Faculty and students, particularly, require integration with society for a well-rounded experience.
The debate extends to the public’s desire to engage with university life. During summer vacations, parents often wish to visit universities with their children for educational purposes. Moreover, many university campuses have become popular tourist destinations, contributing to the city’s cultural and technological landscape.
As educational hubs, universities should ideally strike a balance between security and openness, contributing to the public good while maintaining their primary educational mission. Open campuses not only enrich the community but also enhance the social influence of universities.
Safety and order are valid concerns, but they should not impede the opening of campuses. Universities, nestled in urban settings, are pivotal to city life and should foster a connection between academia and the broader community.
In conclusion, the ongoing debate in China reflects the complex challenge universities face in balancing public access with maintaining a secure and functional environment. It is crucial to find a middle ground that upholds the integrity of educational institutions while embracing their societal role.
READ MORE: