Replacing Nvidia in China is no small feat, but analysts warn that Chinese tech firms are narrowing the gap—ironically, aided by U.S. export restrictions. Initially implemented to curb China’s military advancement and preserve American dominance in artificial intelligence, these semiconductor controls have led to unintended consequences. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has called the export controls a “failure,” arguing that they have harmed U.S. companies more than China. Although the restrictions aimed to limit China’s access to cutting-edge AI chips, loopholes and pre-existing semiconductor stockpiles have reduced their effectiveness.
Tech analysts, such as Ray Wang, point out that the restrictions have not only failed to achieve their goals but may have contributed to the narrowing divide between Chinese and American AI capabilities. U.S. firms, including Nvidia, have expressed concern over the loss of access to China’s lucrative commercial market. Huang noted that Nvidia’s market share in China has plummeted from 95% to 50% in just four years.
Industry experts agree that the export controls have sparked unintended consequences. Paul Triolo, Senior VP for China at DGA Group, explains that the measures both reduce U.S. companies’ access to China and incentivize China to double down on domestic innovation. In effect, the U.S. is nurturing future competitors by isolating its tech leaders from one of the world’s largest markets. Washington’s export control policies began under President Trump and expanded significantly under President Biden, including restrictions targeting major Chinese firms like Huawei and SMIC.
Nvidia disclosed in April that recent controls limiting sales of its H20 GPU to China resulted in a $5.5 billion revenue hit. The policy, while intended to stifle China’s tech growth, appears to be accelerating the country’s pursuit of chip self-sufficiency. China has poured billions into its domestic semiconductor industry, with companies like Huawei making strides in AI chip development. AI achievements, such as the launch of DeepSeek’s R1 model and Huawei’s chip advancements, have sparked debate about whether these restrictions are achieving their strategic goals.
According to Wang, the controls have coincided with a surge in AI-focused startups, domestic talent, and technological breakthroughs in China. He believes the argument that restrictions can drive innovation holds merit. Jensen Huang echoed this sentiment in April, acknowledging that China has made significant strides and is catching up fast.
The controls have evolved over time, beginning as targeted sanctions and now expanding into broader restrictions without a clearly defined endpoint. Triolo describes this trend as a shifting set of objectives, aimed less at specific targets and more at slowing China’s tech development altogether. This lack of clarity has generated concern among stakeholders.
A recent post from the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation criticized the ongoing strategy, stating that the policy has largely failed while inflicting collateral damage. The think tank argues that while protecting U.S. military interests is necessary, the blanket ban on commercial AI technology sales to China has cost companies like Nvidia billions in lost revenue—money vital for future innovation. The outcome suggests that the U.S. may need to reconsider its approach to remain competitive in the global semiconductor landscape.
READ MORE: