In the shifting landscape of international commerce, China has made decisive moves to strengthen its export controls in the wake of comparable actions taken by the United States and amid escalating trade disagreements with Europe and India.
Recent developments saw the world’s second-largest economy imposing restrictions on the export of two particular rare metals and drones that could potentially be utilized for military purposes. These actions underline the deepening complexities of international and domestic trade situations, as highlighted by a statement released post a two-day summit coordinated by the Ministry of Commerce.
“Understanding the multifaceted challenges both at home and abroad is pivotal,” the statement read. “Our objectives must be clear, and we must approach our tasks innovatively, expediting our efforts to refine our export control mechanisms.”
This vital meeting took place in Xiongan New Area, a nascent urban area approximately 60 miles away from Beijing. The core takeaway was China’s dedication to implementing a systematic, disciplined, and stringent export control system, reflecting the country’s growing assertiveness in the domain of global trade.
China’s export control law, which became operational in 2020, augmented its capabilities to effectively counter trade barriers presented by other nations. Mirroring aspects of the US Export Administration Regulations, it presented a catalog of items under control, encompassing sensitive technology, military apparatus, and dual-use articles. This list dictates that these commodities need a license before being exported.
A notable clause within the law allows China the right to counteract any nation that transgresses export regulations, potentially compromising China’s national security. Yet, the specifics of what precisely amounts to a violation remain somewhat ambiguous.
Historical context is crucial. The previous year, 2021, saw the United States blacklisting a dozen Chinese corporations, among them, high-profile entities like the world-leading commercial drone manufacturer DJI Technology and China’s Academy of Military Medical Sciences. These bans were on grounds of their supposed military affiliations or alleged surveillance activities concerning Muslim minorities in Xinjiang.
China responded swiftly in the subsequent month, unveiling its pioneering white paper concerning export controls. It promised a more proactive role in molding global export constraints that are “fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory.” The white paper also delineated the scope of these controls, covering dual-use commodities, military goods, nuclear materials, and other items with the potential to jeopardize national security. Furthermore, it referenced constraints connected to non-proliferation and other global duties.
Fast forward to August of the current year; China implemented restrictions on two rare metals – gallium and germanium, pivotal in the creation of advanced technological equipment. Simultaneously, there were restrictions on certain industrial compounds and drones with potential military applications, moves reflective of China’s intent to “protect national security and interests.”
Highlighting China’s dominance in this sphere, it’s noteworthy that the nation is responsible for an overwhelming majority of the global output of these metals – with gallium production exceeding 95% and germanium at 67%.
Such actions have not gone unnoticed. The U.S. administration expressed its staunch opposition to these constraints, signaling its intention to collaborate with global allies to navigate these challenges and fortify pivotal supply chains.
These restrictions are part of a broader narrative, notably the U.S.’s initiative to curtail China’s semiconductor manufacturing prowess via export controls. This campaign gained traction with countries like the Netherlands, which introduced new controls on the export of cutting-edge chip manufacturing equipment.
China’s role in the global drone market is also under the microscope. As one of the most significant producers of civilian drones globally, several Chinese brands have found their way into military skirmishes globally, including in flashpoints like Ukraine.
Commenting on the evolving dynamics, the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade, the nation’s trade promotional body, remarked earlier in the week about the continued high levels of strain in relations between major economies. Data indicates the primary points of contention lie with the U.S., the European Union, and India. The sectors predominantly affected encompass electronics, mechanical apparatus, and light manufacturing.
In summary, as the tectonic plates of global trade continue to shift, nations like China are adapting, re-evaluating, and strengthening their strategic positions. It is a clear testament to the intertwined nature of global economies and the delicate balance that needs maintained in this age of rapid globalization.
Read More: