On a recent Tuesday, officials from China, Japan, and South Korea met in Seoul for discussions that could significantly impact the geopolitics of East Asia. The meeting, revealed by Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin, focused on resuming trilateral cooperation. A foreign ministers’ meeting is planned for the coming months, and talks are ongoing to potentially hold a leaders’ summit soon.
Participants
The meeting was attended by Nong Rong, China’s assistant minister of foreign affairs; Takehiro Funakoshi, Japan’s senior deputy foreign minister; and Chung Byung-won, South Korea’s deputy foreign minister. The selection of these high-level officials indicates the seriousness with which each country regards these talks.
Scope of Cooperation
Wang Wenbin elaborated that the cooperation would extend to various sectors such as culture, people-to-people exchanges, economy, trade, scientific innovation, sustainable development, and public health. This comprehensive approach serves the mutual interests of all three nations and aims to contribute positively to regional stability.
South Korea as Chair
South Korea proposed a trilateral summit in late December, suggesting the nation is pushing for stronger ties despite its existing alliance with the United States. South Korea, serving as the chair of this trilateral cooperation, aims to play a crucial role in balancing power dynamics in the region.
The Challenge of Balancing Ties
Chinese analysts caution that South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol needs to mend relations with China, which have been strained due to Seoul’s pro-U.S. stance. Yoon has veered toward an increasingly pro-U.S. foreign policy, affecting its relationship with China, its largest trading partner.
Economic Concerns and Approval Ratings
South Korea’s foreign policy impacts have had domestic repercussions, notably on its economy and job market, affecting Yoon’s approval ratings. A recent Gallup poll showed a modest 34% approval rating for Yoon. Thus, reviving the leaders’ meeting with China could be a strategic move to boost his domestic standing.
The U.S. Factor
The Chinese Foreign Ministry criticized the U.S.-Japan-South Korea summit at Camp David in August as an attempt to sow discord. Some Chinese analysts suggest this could be a step toward creating a U.S.-led “mini NATO” in the region, forcing other countries to be more assertive.
Bargaining Chips
Dong Xiangrong, a senior fellow at the National Institute of International Strategy at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, argued that South Korea’s closeness to the U.S. does not give it extra leverage in talks with China. Bilateral and trilateral settings will dictate China’s relationship with South Korea.
Ministerial Talks and Timetables
Before any leaders’ summit can be arranged, ministerial-level talks need to take place. Setting tangible timetables and topics for discussions won’t be straightforward, requiring in-depth negotiations.
Controversies
Lü Chao warned that Yoon’s government must correct its stance on several issues, such as its remarks over Taiwan and its anti-China alliance in the chip industry, to move forward with trilateral talks.
Military Provocations
The same week saw South Korea’s first large-scale military parade in a decade, including U.S. combat troops. This move could lead to a hardline response from North Korea, according to Lü Chao, potentially undermining regional stability.
Conclusion
The trilateral talks among China, Japan, and South Korea are a complex interplay of geopolitics, domestic pressures, and shifting global alliances. While a leaders’ summit is not yet confirmed, the importance of these talks cannot be overstated for the stability and prosperity of the East Asian region.
Read More: