Taylor Swift is taking Europe by storm, with sold-out shows from Dublin to Vienna prompting discussions of an economic windfall. Alongside the upcoming Olympics in France and the Euro 2024 soccer championship in Germany, Swift’s tour is expected to inject vitality into a continent that has narrowly avoided recession over the past two years and lagged behind the United States in economic growth. However, the concept of “Swiftonomics” – the idea that her concerts could have a significant economic impact – may be more hype than reality.
Stockholm serves as a prime example. Nearly 180,000 fans attended Swift’s three shows in May, with half of them traveling from abroad, generating approximately 850 million crowns ($81 million) in turnover for the city. While this is a substantial boost for Stockholm’s tourism sector over a weekend, it’s a minor blip for Sweden’s economy, which has an annual output of $623 billion. Carl Bergkvist, Chief Economist at the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, noted, “This extra turnover is a great weekend boost for Stockholm, but it’s just that—a weekend, with no significant impact on overall economic growth.”
Hotels and restaurants enjoyed a surge in business, and even sales of cowboy hats spiked by 155%. However, the overall effect on prices and economic metrics is negligible, potentially smaller than the impact of Beyoncé’s performance a year earlier, which caused a temporary inflation scare. Despite this, Swedish inflation has since dropped from 10% to just over 2%.
Economist Carsten Brzeski from ING remarked, “Is there a Taylor Swift effect? It’s extremely small and temporary, at best.” Research often highlights economic benefits in the lead-up to major events, but post-event analysis shows minimal lasting impact. This sentiment extends to other significant events like the Olympics or Euro 2024, which primarily boost specific sectors like hospitality and merchandise sales but do not alter long-term consumption patterns.
Professor Simon Shibli of Sheffield Hallam University explained that consumer spending on events like concerts often substitutes for other expenditures. Money spent on tickets and hotels is diverted from other parts of a family’s budget, such as dining out or travel.
A “draft beer index” from Danske Bank humorously noted surges in pub and restaurant sales during Denmark’s previous European Championship games. However, as Danske’s Piet Haines Christiansen pointed out, “On a micro level, such events provide a boost, but even that is small and temporary.” The primary beneficiaries are hotels, catering, and localized businesses.
Media reports recently cited Barclays research suggesting Swift’s concerts could inject one billion sterling into the UK economy. However, much of the tour’s revenue will return to the United States, muting any local economic benefits. For large economies like Britain or those in continental Europe, such financial transfers are negligible. The euro zone, for instance, had a trade surplus of 39 billion euros in April alone, underscoring the limited impact of even high-profile events on overall economic performance.
READ MORE: