“It’s all fake news” – Donald Trump, the 45th US president.
In an era where the digital world reigns supreme, the media landscape has found itself caught in a quagmire of real and fake news, with both becoming almost indistinguishable. As a seasoned media professional with a nearly 30-year career, I must admit that this confusing junction has brought the industry to a turning point where longevity offers no guarantee of competence.
The Confusing Landscape of News in the 21st Century
Let’s begin by examining a particularly perplexing instance of this phenomenon. Recently, two leading “news” publications from the Anglo-American world shared the following headlines:
- Chinese seafood hides surveillance devices.
- Chinese electric vehicles hide surveillance devices.
To the casual observer, both statements may seem absurd or even comical. However, these headlines have become symbolic of the larger issue at hand: the rise of mistrust in international trade, particularly with China.
The Case of Spying Shrimps
Republican Mike Gallagher, chairman of the US House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, has reportedly claimed that spying devices have been found hidden in seafood imported from China.
“Every day, the United States is recklessly importing thousands of pounds of seafood from China that could contain God knows what kind of wiretapping devices,” Gallagher was quoted as saying.
In response to this alarming revelation, the House of Representatives has passed a resolution condemning China’s use of what has now become infamously known as “surveillance shrimps.”
The idea of wiretapping devices being embedded in seafood may seem like the stuff of spy novels, but this incident has highlighted real concerns about international espionage and security. It raises crucial questions about how countries must protect their citizens and national interests while balancing the necessities of global trade.
Cars: The New Frontier of Spying?
Meanwhile, on the other side of the Atlantic, the British parliament’s Intelligencehttps://isc.independent.gov.uk/ and Security Committee issued a warning that China has successfully penetrated every sector of the British economy, with particular concern over Chinese-made electric cars.
A news report headlined, “The alarming reality of cheap Chinese cars on British roads – an invasion of cheap Chinese electric vehicles is fast approaching,” detailed the rise of Chinese automotive brands. Brands like BYD have unveiled electric vehicles far cheaper than many petrol-fueled models, boasting features such as long ranges, attractive designs, and smart interiors.
The real danger, as it turns out, is not just the affordability and quality of these vehicles. According to the report, “modern cars are increasingly dependent on ‘over the air’ software updates, which they receive through a mobile phone-style SIM card that is built into the vehicle.” The fear is that these Chinese electric vehicles will become instruments of electronic surveillance for the communist state.
“If a malicious actor gained access to these update systems, through servers known as ‘the backend’, they could beam out software that allows them to spy on vehicles and their driver remotely,” the report noted ominously.
The concern goes beyond hacking, extending to the manufacturers themselves, who may be subject to national security laws forcing them to comply with government requests in China.
The situation has raised eyebrows, particularly after the Western world’s crackdown on the spying 5G business of Huawei Technologies. The UK government, previously vigilant against Chinese tech giants like Huawei, seems to have been asleep at the wheel while this hi-tech surveillance giant made a comeback in Europe and Britain by supplying car gear.
“Huawei may have been kicked out of the UK’s 5G network,” the story continued, “but in December, the company reportedly made sales of its smart car technology to Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, and Porsche, putting Huawei products in 15 million cars a year.”
Dame Priti Patel, the former British home secretary, believes that her country must take similar action against Chinese electric vehicles as it did against Huawei’s 5G technology. “Under no circumstances can we revert backward and end up being dependent on nations like China,” she reportedly said.
The Challenge of Discerning Real from Fake
Amid these wild claims and staggering revelations, the onus falls on readers to discern what is real and what is fake. One of the aforementioned stories originates from the US satirical publication The Onion, while the other hails from the highly respected conservative British broadsheet The Telegraph.
However, this does not necessarily mean that the ‘fake’ news is entirely devoid of truth, nor does it indicate that the ‘real’ news is entirely free from sensationalism or bias.
What this juxtaposition serves to illustrate is the blurred lines that now exist between truth and fiction in our modern media landscape. The complexity of international politics, technology, and economics is being played out on the global stage, and media organizations are struggling to present clear, unbiased information to the public.
Conclusion
The surveillance weather balloon fiasco, the tale of spying shrimps, and the alarm raised over cars exported from China have all contributed to the current climate of uncertainty and confusion in international relations and news reporting.
As we navigate this complex landscape, the responsibility falls not only on journalists and media professionals but also on readers and consumers of news. We must all exercise critical thinking, diligence, and a discerning eye to separate fact from fiction, real from fake, and truth from deception.
It’s a task that is neither easy nor straightforward, but it is one that is absolutely essential if we are to maintain trust and integrity in the media and in our democratic societies. The stakes are high, and the path ahead is fraught with challenges, but the pursuit of truth remains a noble and necessary endeavor.
Read More: