Tesla has initiated a legal battle for the recognition of a shareholder vote favoring Elon Musk’s record compensation package. In a letter made public on Monday, Tesla urged Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick to consider the recent ratification by shareholders, arguing it “significantly impacts” her prior ruling that voided Musk’s pay.
Tesla’s attorneys requested that the parties in the case present their legal interpretations of the shareholder vote from Thursday rather than proceed with the case according to the previous schedule. “The approval of ratification by Tesla’s stockholders significantly impacts the claims and issues in this action, including the court’s final judgment,” Tesla’s legal team wrote to McCormick in the letter filed with the Delaware Court of Chancery on Friday.
Greg Varallo, representing the shareholders opposing the pay package, asserted that the ratification holds “no legal effect” on the ongoing case and promised to elaborate on this argument in a brief due on Friday. Tesla acknowledged the ratification process was “novel” and admitted uncertainty about whether McCormick and the Delaware Supreme Court would accept the outcome.
Tesla contends that the ratification resolves the issues highlighted in McCormick’s January ruling. The judge had determined that Musk controlled the 2018 process leading to his compensation package and that Tesla failed to disclose critical information to shareholders about the achievable targets Musk had to meet for his compensation. Tesla stated that a special board committee reviewed the pay package and deemed it in the best interest of shareholders, addressing the concern over Musk’s dominance in the process.
The shareholder vote was corrected by providing additional disclosures, including McCormick’s 200-page opinion, which was sent to shareholders in hundreds of pages of documentation.
Before Tesla can appeal McCormick’s ruling to the Delaware Supreme Court, the judge must also determine a fee for the shareholder legal team. The shareholders’ attorneys are seeking approximately $5 billion in Tesla stock as their legal fee, whereas Tesla argued that they should be awarded around $13.6 million.
This legal tussle underscores the complexities and high stakes involved in Musk’s compensation package, which has been a contentious issue among Tesla’s shareholders and its board. The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for corporate governance and executive compensation in high-profile companies.
As the court proceedings unfold, Tesla remains focused on convincing the judiciary that the shareholder ratification has addressed the previously identified issues, seeking to overturn the ruling that invalidated Musk’s pay package. The coming weeks will be crucial in determining the final resolution of this high-stakes legal battle.
READ MORE: