Introduction
China and Russia’s third joint naval patrol, which allegedly reached international waters near Alaska last week, has caused a stir among US media outlets. This maneuver has been described as “highly provocative,” despite the fact that the US frequently sends military forces to China’s doorsteps. The tension is palpable, and this article aims to explore the facts, perspectives, and possible implications of this development.
The Naval Patrol
According to a report by the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), 11 Chinese and Russian vessels approached the Aleutian Islands but did not enter US territorial waters. Four US destroyers and a P-8 maritime patrol aircraft shadowed the Chinese and Russian naval force.
While a US Northern Command spokesperson stated that the patrol remained in international waters and was not considered a threat, other US experts were quoted as saying the voyage was a “historical first” and “highly provocative.”
Background
This occurrence followed the announcement by China’s Ministry of National Defense on July 26 that China and Russia would soon launch their third joint naval patrol. This operation would see both nations’ warships sail into West and North Pacific waters after the Northern/Interaction-2023 joint exercises in the Sea of Japan.
The Chinese Defense Ministry asserted that the operation was not targeted against any third party or related to any international or regional situation. Vessels including guided missile destroyers, guided missile frigates, and a comprehensive replenishment ship from the Chinese Navy, as well as large anti-submarine ships and corvettes from the Russian Navy, were included in the flotilla.
Senior Colonel Tan Kefei, a spokesperson at China’s Defense Ministry, stressed that these exercises and the subsequent joint naval patrol signify the strategic mutual trust between the two countries and further enhance the traditional friendship between the Chinese and Russian militaries.
China has expressed its intention to continue pragmatic communication and cooperation with all parties to contribute to regional peace and stability and address various security threats.
US Media Reaction
Despite China and Russia’s transparent announcement of the joint patrol, US media outlets have been fervently discussing the “China and Russia threat” theory. This is perhaps a reaction to the growing cooperation between these two powers, which the US perceives as a potential challenge to its regional and global influence.
Regional Stability and Security
According to Zhuo Hua, an international affairs expert at the School of International Relations and Diplomacy of Beijing Foreign Studies University, the China-Russia joint patrol is seen as a positive force that helps to safeguard regional stability and security of strategic routes in the Asia-Pacific region.
This move comes at a time when the US is intensifying its combat readiness, rallying allies and partners to change defense policies, and expanding militaries. Such actions have escalated regional tensions, leading some experts to view the China-Russia cooperation as a counterbalance.
Historical Context
China and Russia’s collaboration is not an isolated incident but part of a series of joint efforts to express mutual trust and coordination. This is not the first time that these two nations have conducted a joint naval patrol, and it’s unlikely to be the last.
Conclusion
The third joint naval patrol by China and Russia near Alaska has undoubtedly captured international attention. While some view it as a provocative move, others interpret it as a reflection of the growing cooperation and trust between two significant powers in a complex geopolitical environment.
US media’s reaction highlights the underlying tensions and the strategic chess game being played in the Asia-Pacific region. The portrayal of the patrol as “highly provocative” can also be seen as a reflection of the US’s concerns about its position in the ever-shifting global landscape.
Ultimately, this event emphasizes the delicate balance of power and the ongoing dance of diplomacy, trust, and strategy among major world players. How these dynamics evolve will have long-lasting effects on international relations and global security.
Contrary to the claims made by the US media, the recent joint naval patrol by China and Russia in waters off Alaska is not a “historical first.” A similar event occurred during their second joint naval patrol in September 2022. This incident has sparked discussion and analysis of the growing tensions between major powers and what this signifies in the broader geopolitical landscape.
Context and Historical Background
The recent event follows previous joint naval patrols in international waters near Alaska. In August 2021, a Chinese naval flotilla was spotted off the coast of the Aleutian Islands, and in 2015, five PLA Navy ships transited through the Aleutian Island chain, abiding by international law.
These exercises serve as a countermeasure against the US, frequently making provocations near China in the name of freedom of navigation, according to Chinese experts.
The Recent Patrol
In the latest patrol, 11 Chinese and Russian warships reached the waters off Alaska, only to be shadowed by the USS John S. McCain, the USS Benfold, the USS John Finn, the USS Chung-Hoon destroyers, and a P-8 maritime patrol aircraft, as reported by the WSJ. During the second joint patrol in 2022, only a lone US Coast Guard cutter was on the scene, highlighting an escalation in the US response.
Alleged Links to Global Politics
The US media has attempted to connect the escalation in the US reaction to the Ukraine crisis and the Taiwan question. However, analysts argue that such speculation is baseless and intended to undermine the normal military cooperation between China and Russia. The hegemonic mindset and double standard of the US are considered the real reasons behind its anxiety.
The Strategic Importance of the North Pacific
The international waters in the North Pacific, including the Bering Sea, hold strategic importance, according to Fu Qianshao, a Chinese military expert. With global warming, the Arctic shipping routes could become vital for civilian ships to conduct commercial activities.
China and Russia’s joint patrols are seen as safeguarding the security of these key strategic routes, while the US is perceived to be attempting to control the passages due to its hegemonic mindset.
The US’s Double Standard
The irony of the situation is not lost on observers. While the China-Russia joint flotilla did not enter US territorial waters, US warships have repeatedly trespassed into Chinese territorial waters in the South China Sea.
The US forces involved in shadowing the China-Russia joint flotilla have also provoked China in the past, with records of being expelled after trespassing into Chinese waters. This highlights the US’s double standard, which seems to only allow its military presence near other countries but does not tolerate other countries’ military presence near its territory.
The Future of Naval Patrols
From a military perspective, the US’s reaction was limited to monitoring the China-Russia joint flotilla. Analysts assert that the US forces were not capable of doing more than that.
Fu predicts that “In the future, the Chinese Navy could conduct more far sea patrols like this, either alone or together with other countries. The Americans should get used to it.”
Conclusion: A Reassessment of Geopolitical Dynamics
The China-Russia joint naval patrols near Alaska are far from being a historical first, as portrayed by the US media. Instead, they symbolize a broader geopolitical narrative that highlights the strategic interests of global powers and the complex interactions that shape international relations.
The US’s reaction to these patrols exposes a double standard and an underlying anxiety driven by a hegemonic mindset. On the other hand, China and Russia’s cooperation signals a growing alliance and alignment of strategic interests.
As global warming opens up new strategic passages, the importance of these waters will only increase. Future patrols and exercises, either by China alone or in collaboration with other countries, are expected, challenging the US to adapt to a changing geopolitical landscape.
In the face of escalating tensions and a rapidly evolving global context, all parties must navigate carefully, recognizing the inherent complexities and potential consequences of their actions. The situation calls for a reassessment of the dynamics at play, including the principles of freedom of navigation and the respect for international law, to foster stability and cooperation rather than contention and mistrust.
These events underline the significance of dialogue, understanding, and a clear-eyed assessment of each other’s interests and concerns. They serve as a reminder that the waters of diplomacy are often fraught with unseen currents, and those who navigate them must do so with caution, insight, and a commitment to the principles that promote peace and mutual respect.
Read More: